Access Agilent eNewsletter January 2016
Chevron and Agilent collaborate on new multi-element crude oil analysis technology that delivers advantages in speed, cost, and safety
Wayne Collins, Agilent Global Industry Manager
Elemental concentrations in crude oil are vitally important to the petroleum industry throughout the entire supply chain. Metal types and concentrations are used to monitor crude migration within a reservoir and are a factor in determining the market price of a batch of oil. They also affect the efficiency of catalysts during refining and are integral to final product quality. What’s more, metal profiles are also instrumental in “fingerprinting” oil during an environmental incident to identify the source and to monitor the effectiveness of remediation efforts.
Laboratories have used several technologies for measurements of metal types and concentrations. Now, Agilent has partnered with Chevron [1] to add another technology, microwave plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (MP-AES), as it is increasingly used for the multi-element analysis of a wide range of sample types.
MP-AES technique delivers lower operation costs and improved safety
The Agilent 4200 MP-AES uses magnetically coupled microwave energy to generate robust and stable plasma using nitrogen gas from the air. This eliminates the need for expensive argon or flammable gases, such as acetylene. Lower cost operation and improved safety are top priorities for all petroleum laboratories. Generating the plasma from air is also a big plus for petroleum companies that must support labs in remote regions of the world where sustainable gas supplies can be limited.
Employing the 4200 MP-AES, Chevron and Agilent analyzed 20 crude oil samples with API gravity 7 to 38°, with a range of nitrogen and sulfur contents. A fast and easy method with minimal sample preparation was the goal. The method comprised a simple 〜 1:10 dilution in o-xylene containing mineral oil, a matrix modifier, and scandium as the internal standard. The elements were limited to V, Ca, Fe, Ni, K, and Na, though others are possible.
More sensitive calibrations and lower detection limits
The results of the analysis showed improved calibrations and lower detection limits. The calibration curves obtained for all elements indicated excellent linearity over the calibration range with correlation coefficients from 0.99988 to 1.0000. Method detection limits (3σ) were calculated by measuring a blank solution 10 times and then by measuring a 1 ppm standard solution 10 times. The MDLs were comparable for all elements by both methods and were well into the sub ppm range.
Good recoveries validated in spiked sample tests
During the testing, at the midpoint concentration of the calibration (5 ppm), a continuing calibration verification sample was analyzed seven times. Next a crude oil sample was spiked with the mixed standard at 885 ppm to validate the method at high concentration. Finally, certified reference sample NIST 1634c Trace Elements in Fuel Oil was analyzed seven times for V (certified 28.19 ppm) and Ni (certified 17.54 ppm) only. In all three tests, recoveries were within ±10%.
Improved test results for crude oil samples
Table 1 shows results achieved when the method was used to determine elements in 20 crude oil samples.
Sample | Fe | SD | V | SD | Ni | SD | Ca | SD | Na | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
259.940 nm | 311.070 nm | 341.476 nm | 396.847 nm | 588.995 nm | ||||||
ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | ppm | ||||||
S1 | 0.46 | 0.13 | 13.86 | 0.03 | 9.51 | 0.05 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S2 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 132.42 | 0.39 | 33.61 | 0.06 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S3 | 1.98 | 0.03 | 2.14 | 0.02 | 2.42 | 0.03 | 2.04 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.13 |
S4 | 8.99 | 0.14 | 225.88 | 0.27 | 59.55 | 0.12 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 11.13 | 0.42 |
S5 | 0.55 | 0.04 | 2.09 | 0.02 | 0.81 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.00 | LDL | 0.08 |
S6 | 26.02 | 0.14 | 115.09 | 0.10 | 87.45 | 0.28 | 13.97 | 0.59 | 15.62 | 0.15 |
S7 | 23.52 | 0.11 | 39.12 | 0.13 | 68.56 | 0.13 | 1.09 | 0.09 | 2.35 | 0.11 |
S8 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 15.88 | 0.08 | 12.79 | 0.01 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S9 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 24.50 | 0.05 | 12.40 | 0.05 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S10 | 9.65 | 0.57 | 0.13 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.03 | 5.05 | 0.33 | 5.99 | 0.39 |
S11 | 13.38 | 0.25 | 6.02 | 0.04 | 5.19 | 0.05 | 4.99 | 0.08 | 18.57 | 0.61 |
S12 | 0.81 | 0.08 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 1.23 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.74 | 0.05 |
S13 | 1.27 | 0.06 | 2.19 | 0.01 | 1.60 | 0.01 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 0.65 | 0.09 |
S14 | 1.21 | 0.05 | 59.63 | 0.29 | 20.67 | 0.03 | 0.87 | 0.01 | 4.54 | 0.06 |
S15 | 2.17 | 0.05 | 177.45 | 0.58 | 35.86 | 0.22 | 5.97 | 0.02 | LDL | 0.04 |
S16 | 11.89 | 0.23 | 2.57 | 0.02 | 4.56 | 0.04 | 4.01 | 0.02 | 44.36 | 1.56 |
S17 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 24.83 | 0.09 | 12.63 | 0.03 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S18 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 18.80 | 0.10 | 12.02 | 0.03 | LDL | - | LDL | - |
S19 | 10.47 | 0.73 | 71.05 | 0.57 | 28.09 | 0.19 | 2.43 | 0.09 | 8.39 | 0.58 |
S20 | 130.99 | 1.05 | 87.48 | 0.21 | 68.08 | 0.18 | 58.29 | 0.27 | 26.59 | 0.41 |
*S20b | 130.81 | 0.86 | 87.08 | 0.32 | 68.15 | 0.06 | 59.43 | 0.62 | 25.89 | 0.22 |
Comparison of sample analysis methodologies
The same 20 crude oil samples were also analyzed by ICP-MS or ICP-OES to demonstrate comparability with these established technologies. Figure 1 shows a good correlation between the techniques. More information on this comparison of analysis techniques can be found in the August 2015 issue of Energy & Fuels [1].
Agilent and Chevron: partners for success
Chevron and Agilent demonstrated that MP-AES is a viable alternative to other methods for the elemental analysis of crude oil, while offering advantages in speed, cost, safety, and ease of preparation. A draft ASTM standard has been written based on this work and will be proposed at a meeting of section D02.03. Agilent has many analytical solutions for refinery operations, all backed by an industry-leading portfolio of supplies. Visit the Agilent web site today to learn more about our MP-AES systems and offerings.
Reference
- Nelson, J.; Gilleland, G,; Poirier, L.; Leong, D.; Hajdu, P.; Lopez-Linares, F. Elemental Analysis of Crude Oils Using Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy. Energy & Fuels, 10 August, 2015. Reprinted with permission.
Stay informed about the applications that are important to you
Subscribe to Access Agilent
Our free customized
monthly eNewsletter
Article Directory – January 2016
All articles in this issue
- What is in your beer? Find out using a Agilent J&W DB-624 Ultra Inert (UI) column with GC/MS static headspace solution
- Moving biologics to market with automated biopharma workflow solution
- Nobel Prize-winning lab uses Agilent equipment to accelerate natural product discoveries
- Tip: How to detect leachables from drug container closures in pharmaceutical products
- Fast, accurate absolute-quantification of proteins and antibodies with Agilent 8800 ICP-QQQ
- Chevron and Agilent collaborate on new multi-element crude oil analysis technology that delivers advantages in speed, cost, and safety
- Ask the Expert: Can I improve the chromatography of basic compounds on my older HPLC systems?
- More pesticides identified using Agilent Pesticide DRS Screening GC/MSD Analyzer with new high efficiency source
- Improved peak shapes for active semivolatiles with inert Agilent J&W DB-UI 8270D columns